Zenmaster more like Dynasty Extender

31 07 2009

There’s been a surge of debate the last couple days on ESPN Radio regarding a Sporting News list that came out listing the top 50 coaches of all-time. Eric Kuselias, filling in for Colin Cowherd on his show today, derided Phil Jackson’s listing as No. 4 on the historic list.

His point of contention was that Jackson never provided a moment where he made you or I say, “Damn, Phil really coached the hell out of the team to a win.” Of course, it’s a silly argument because I’m sure if any of us were to give up everything in our lives and dive into Phil Jackson Research, we’d be able to find at least one or two moments in the 10 seasons he won a championship where his coaching provided the basis for a win. How about Jackson’s ability to coax 55 wins out of a Michael Jordan-less Chicago Bulls team in the 1993-94 season? That was a hell of a coaching job Jackson did that year.

Yet what I find most people under-estimate in Jackson has been his ability to string together titles. All his naysayers, like Kuselias today, like to point out that Jackson couldn’t possibly be the only coach who could’ve won a title with Jordan/Pippen or Shaq/Kobe. They’d be right. They are right. But Jackson is the only coach who could’ve kept the focus, drive and determination to win back-to-back-to-back titles with three different squads. 

The ability to win two or three straight titles in any sport never gets enough credit. That’s an incredible amount of focus and discipline, not to mention selflessness, that a team must have. What coach has ever been more successful in implementing that motivating mindset after a team has already experienced its greatest success? Of course, John Wooden deserves credit for his 10 titles in 12 years, but NBA ball goes through much longer seasons with at a much higher skill level.

The fact Jackson was able to extract basically all the talent out of each of his dynasties is what his legacy should be. The argument about Jackson shouldn’t be whether any coach could’ve won a title with the dynamic players he’s coached. It should be about who else could’ve maintained the level of focus and discipline to win three titles in a row — with three teams.





Matt’s on a Holliday

31 07 2009

Deconstructing Matt Holliday

Or that’s what it has to feel like now that he’s transitioned his MLB life from hitting with injury-riddled steroid freaks like Jason Giambi and Nomar Garciaparra in the offensive black hole that is Oakland’s McAfee Coliseum to hitting behind merely the best in the game, Albert Pujols, with the St. Louis Cardinals. 

Fantasy owners who traded for Holliday before his trade from Oakland to St. Louis were treated to a surge in his overall value. Wish I had been more proactive in recognizing how much his situation could have improved by getting dealt from the A’s.





Pining for Lamar

30 07 2009

Lamar Odom holds the Larry O_Brien trophy We can all likely agree that greed is partly a by-product of success. Whenever one’s favorite sports team (Lakers!!) wins a championship, there’s a celebratory grace period which ends only when the realization of a second title begins to whet the appetite. As a Lakers fan, I can vouch for that mindset. It’s been exacerbated by the continuing uncertainty regarding the composition of next season’s Lakers roster.

I still haven’t warmed to the idea of Ron Artest replacing Trevor Ariza. A brief read through the Sports Guy’s latest column re-emphasized my anxiety of losing Ariza. Bill Simmons hit the nail on the head when he explained Artest simply isn’t the perimeter defender he once was. He’s nearly 30, has lost some athleticism and, more than anything, he’s living off the reputation he gained as THE premier NBA defender in his mid-20s.

Ariza is 24, is discriminating enough in his shot selection to make him a perfect complement to Kobe Bryant and he gave the Lakers a measure of foot speed which the team no longer has outside of Jordan Farmer and possibly Shannon Brown.

But I can live with Artest-for-Ariza if that’s the only major change to the roster. That’s why the possibility of losing Lamar Odom is enough to make me question whether Dr. Jerry Buss has lost his mind as the Lakers’ owner. It’s hard to question the credibility of an owner who’s presided over nine Lakers championships, but he might be taking his pride too far in Odom’s negotiations.

Why the Lakers are quibbling over an extra year of Odom is beyond me. His value to the team is unquestioned. He’s also working toward turning 30, yet his game is more fluid and his presence is more valuable closer to the basket. He would make the bench once again the best in the league. There’s no other 6’10 left-handed player who can rebound the ball, drive it to the hoop and shoot it from long range with such consistency. His versatility has been well documented.

Moreover, Odom takes pressure off Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum. They don’t feel as though that they have to record 20/10 games, given that Odom is there to clean up — and perhaps take over — whenever needed. 

His persona as the nicest guy on the team, a glue guy, can’t be underestimated. I already worried how losing Ariza would affect a Lakers squad which had seemed to grow quite close, no matter how much the Celtics-worshipping Sports Guy would like to convince his readers otherwise. Signing Odom doesn’t just mean you get the on-court version, but also the off-court guy who’ll resolve team disputes, help motivate down-on-their-luck players and keep Artest somewhat grounded (with help from Bryant and Phil Jackson).

The Miami Heat seem to be the only other realistic team to which Odom will fly. And given how much he’s publicly stated that he loves living in L.A., it could be all but a certainty that he returns. Yet considering how desirable it is to see the Lakers remain atop the NBA as league champions next year, ensuring Odom’s presence on the roster is the only Lakers topic in which I’m interested. Hopefully Dr. Buss and the rest of Lakers management take that worry off the minds of all us Lakers fans.





Tiger’s temper just fine

28 07 2009

I’ve been somewhat disturbed by the upheaval against Tiger Woods and his perceived poor attitude on the golf course. After missing the cut on July 17 at the British Open, Tiger’s critics came, well, out of the woods to sneer at his propensity to throw his club after an errant shot while cursing at a faster rate than any number of characters from Snatch

Even Rick Reilly got into the act in a July 22 ESPN.com piece where he questioned whether Woods would outgrow his temper. Here’s my problem with the argument that Tiger should readjust his temperament on the golf course: Athletes can’t always win the way we want them to win. The way we think they should win.

It’d be easier if fans made a determination beforehand about which was more important: whether an athlete wins or how he or she carries himself on the course/court/field. This isn’t to say that we shouldn’t expect a semblance of dignity, but we can’t expect athletes to adjust the way they play their games just to appease us. 

Every person, like Tiger on the golf course, has his different method of pacing himself mentally, emotionally, through a tournament, game or match. Some can be steadfast in their emotional consistency. Picture Retief Goosen, you golf fans. Others, like Phil Mickelson or Sergio Garcia, show an antsyness when things don’t go right. And others, like Tiger, erupt in a ball of fury at misplaced shots. But it’s okay — Tiger’s method to his madness was certainly good enough during his previous 14 Majors wins.

I remember NBA fans questioning John Stockton’s desire when he played. The man was possibly as tenacious and competitive a player as has ever existed, yet because he showed so little emotion on the court, fans wondered if there was even a heart beating underneath that purple Jazz jersey. Of course, the question of whether Stockton “brought it” every night was ludicrous. He simply had his own way of playing the game, which included showing minimal emotion.

Look to the other end of the spectrum and you have someone like Tiger, whose intensity burns so bright that fans and critics of the game wish he could turn it down a notch. That he could show a little more resolve and respect — like Stockton. 

See, athletes can never win. Fans want the perfect sportsman who shows a cold-blooded killer mindset one minute, then turns around, signs an autograph for a kid and poses with a big, fat smile for the cameras the next. Athletes will always be better off by staying true to their emotions and pacing themselves as they see fit. Fans would be better off by ridding themselves of their idolization of athletes and accepting their emotional rifts for what they truly are: the result of high expectations in an extremely competitive environment.





MLB.com Weekend Watch

10 07 2009

Weekend Watch (July 10-12)

Here’s the link to my weekly column at MLB.com. What I enjoy most about this is uncovering stats I wouldn’t normally find, such as Travis Ishikawa’s surprising home/road splits. Think that guy likes his home cooking? 

Jimmy Rollins is one of the latest early-season slumpers to finally bust out. He’ll probably post huge second-half numbers, thus reminding many owners why it pays off to have foresight in April and May. Dumping proven players when their value is near its lowpoint is almost always a strategy that can come back to haunt even the savviest fantasy owner.

Hopefully some of these tips help anyone playing in daily leagues.





The Walk of Shame

9 07 2009

I was watching Mike Pelfrey saunter off the mound during last night’s Dodgers-Mets game when I realized nobody has ever booed me after a bad day of work. Imagine that. How would you feel if a sizeable portion of 50,000 people called you an idiot and compared your mom to a piece of garbage as you left your job? 

As if it’s not bad enough to perform poorly at work, can you picture having to take a load of crap from some random dude who doesn’t know the first thing about your career? Face it, we’d be Michael Bolton from Office Space and the booing jerk-off would be a copy machine. No way would most of us take the Walk of Shame in a graceful manner.






Time to invest in Artest

3 07 2009

My greatest fear of this NBA offseason has come to fruition. Gone is Trevor Ariza, 24, a Scottie Pippen-clone defensively, only with a much better jumpshot at his age. Arriving is “Ron Ron” Artest, the man who once applied to Target for an offseason job after his NBA rookie year so that he could get employee discounts. (That’s a true story.) The man who once showed up to practice in a bathrobe. The man who made the 2009 Quote of the Year — determined by my friend Chris and I — when he posed this intriguing philosophical question after a playoff game confrontation with Kobe: “Don’t you know you’re hitting Ron Artest?

 

Imagine all the trash talking that'll persist if Kobe and Artest go against each other in practice? Photo is courtesy of Garrett W. Ellwood, NBAE via Getty Images.

Imagine all the trash talking that'll persist if Kobe and Artest go against each other in practice? Photo is courtesy of Garrett W. Ellwood, NBAE via Getty Images.

 And now Artest is set to become a Laker, effectively trading situations with the Rockets-bound Ariza. I’m perplexed at Ariza’s decision more than the Lakers’ choice to go with Artest. Ariza’s agent had communicated that the 24-year-old was insulted the Lakers wouldn’t offer a contract higher than the full mid-level exception, which at a projected $5.8 million this year — $33 million over five years– would be nearly twice what he earned last season. (Artest has the option of signing for the mid-level at three years, $18 mil or five years, $33 mil.) So, Ariza takes his free agent status to Houston and signs with them….for the same offer the Lakers had given him. Give me a minute to wrap my brain around this decision. If you had the choice of the same contract from two teams, only one of them is your hometown squad which you had just won a championship with, and the other faces the possibility of losing its two best players (Yao, McGrady) to injury for much of the upcoming year, which would you sign? 

Let’s put Ariza’s and his agent’s logic to the back burner. Why weren’t the Lakers more aggressive in courting Ariza? He gave them a youthful angle and made for a great young pairing with 21-year-old Andrew Bynum. I suspect one of two scenarios:

  • Something happened behind the scenes. Maybe Ariza became too egotistical as his game exploded to new levels in the spring, even before the playoffs. Maybe he ticked off Kobe. Perhaps the Lakers thought Ariza had hit his ceiling as a player. I can’t figure that one out, so I’m more willing to go with the next scenario.
  • Lakers coaches and management didn’t think they could repeat as NBA Finals winners next year with the same physically slight roster.

In other words, the return of a presumably healthy KG to the Celtics and His Shaqness taking his Twitter-obsessed lifestyle to Cleveland definitely makes two of the three East title contenders more brawny. Richard Jefferson’s addition to the Spurs gives them a Power Four to be reckoned with. Of course, Artest can out-muscle Jefferson or Ginobli, whereas Ariza would simply have to be as quick as them and use his length to disrupt their shots. Remember, the Spurs were without Jefferson (sitting at home as a Milwaukee Buck) or Ginobli (injured) during the ’09 playoffs. Artest is obviously the suspected answer to the theory that the Lakers aren’t physically tough. Yet the substitution of Ariza for Artest seems to reflect more on the Cavs, Spurs and possibly Celtics — if they sign Rasheed Wallace to pair with a healthy KG — anteing up. 

I can’t argue with that logic, but it hurts to see Ariza leave — without the re-assurance of re-signing Lamar Odom. Chances might remain high since Odom and Artest effectively grew up with each other in Queens, New York. If they were to pair together as teammates, that would mean the Lakers’ top four players would be between 29 and 31 for most of next year: Gasol (29), Odom and Artest (30), Bryant (31). Artest’s addition also means Phil Jackson will probably return as head coach, since it isn’t  likely the Lakers front office would add such an emotionally unpredictable dude like Artest without the assurance that Jackson would return. It also gives the Zen Master a new challenge toward the end of his career: molding Ron Artest into a championship-worthy role player. That’s likely not something Artest himself considered when he was filling his W-4 at Target.





MLB Weekend Watch (July 2-5)

2 07 2009

Weekend Watch (July 2-5)

A-Rod will continue to drill the cover off the ball, as he's doing here in a July 1 game. Photo is courtesy of Kathy Willens, AP.

A-Rod will continue to drill the cover off the ball, as he's doing here in a July 1 game. Photo is courtesy of Kathy Willens, AP.

 There are 22 players covered in this plus-size version of Weekend Watch. A-Rod’s game will be affected by his hip the rest of the year, but it doesn’t mean he can’t still crank out 30 homers and 100 RBIs. He certainly shouldn’t be considered a sell-high option. 

 

Jason Bay and Nick Johnson are going through epic stretches of futility, but they’re the types of hitters who figure out their glitches in a timely manner. Check out Chad Tracy’s matchup stat — it might be the single most impressive thing about him you’ll ever see.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.