KFC is going for the kill (supposedly)

25 08 2009

This is what I call marketing savvy. KFC is attempting to take a common Blackjack term — doubling down — and apply it to a sandwich. My interpretation is they’re targeting this sandwich of bliss at the same type of audience who typically go on gambling trips with buddies to Vegas and Atlantic City — dudes, preferably in their 20s. (And teens, too, who enjoy pigging out on terrifically crummy food but who don’t usually play card games.)

I read this blog on thegrio.com asking if KFC is trying to kill people by rolling out the Double Down — basically a cheese and bacon sandwich encased between two pieces of fried chicken. Call KFC what you want, but you have to admit this is their best version of the Atkins diet.

I’m sure KFC’s intent isn’t actually to kill us, just as Obama’s intent isn’t to line people up against a wall and extract death upon them all (despite what some feisty Republicans claim). No, I believe KFC’s intent is to offer guys the perfect snack for the upcoming football season. Guys like melted cheese, they enjoy chicken and they really love bacon. Bread is a throwaway. It can be consumed in so many different ways that removing it from one type of snack or meal won’t make a difference. Remember that guys, especially in their 20s, have short memories.

Anyway, my big concern here is that people want to put up a fight against KFC for this sandwich. They claim KFC is setting a bad example for our country’s dietary issues. Guess what naysayers, companies like KFC churn out these menu options because they have fairly good evidence that people will buy their stuff. KFC, being a manufacturer of fried chicken, isn’t supposed to be the guiding light for healthy eating in the first place.

What I figure would happen is KFC test markets the sandwich. If it’s successful, then they consider rolling it out on a national platform, if they haven’t already. (I’ve eaten at the joint once, so I don’t know their latest menu options.) And if it’s successful nationally, then they keep it. But they’re not going to keep it on the menu for long if it’s NOT successful. Rather, they’ll adjust the contents of the sandwich or scrap it to create a something else that they think will sell.

However, the onus shouldn’t be on KFC to guard against health concerns by dismissing sandwiches like the Double Down. They’re a business, so they need to make money. If they want to exploit Americans’ general weakness for unhealthy, unsophisticated food, then so be it. But we, as consumers, have the ability to force KFC to axe the Double Down. And it’s not by writing blogs protesting it, and by fictitiously telling others that KFC is looking to kill them. It’s by simply not buying the damn sandwich. If it’s such an “offensive” piece of food, as the thegrio.com blog put it, then people will choose to spend their money on a different plate of KFC food or just go to a different eatery altogether.

If we are to battle weight loss in this country, then people should toughen up and realize which food choices are good, which are bad and which are acceptable only in small doses. But abhoring company’s decisions to offer fairly creative menu options for the sake of boosting their revenue is totally unrealistic. We, the consumers, have the choice, even if companies introduce a sandwiches which can probably guarantee heart disease if consumed every day. Nobody is holding a gun to our head to buy this crap. It’s our choice, for better or worse. As it should be.





NYC’s finest ballpark

24 08 2009
I'm partial to the Pepsi Cola sign in right field. The company had a bottling plant in Queens and there is still an existing Pepsi Cola sign in Long Island City, which you can see below.

I'm partial to the Pepsi Cola sign in right field. The company had a bottling plant in Queens and there is still an existing Pepsi Cola sign in Long Island City, which you can see below.

Despite what Yankees brass would like you to believe, there is baseball outside The Bronx. And of the two new MLB ballparks in New York City, I believe the finer one resides in Queens. Despite the fact I’m a Queens (Long Island City) resident, there isn’t a hint of bias in my opinion. Unless it’s the bias toward ballparks with a ton of character and without an air of superiority.

I visited Citi Field for the first time on Saturday as the Mets took on the Phillies, more or less their chief rival. After two games earlier this season at Yankee Stadium, I have to admit that not only does Citi’s brick exterior make for a more homely look than the Stadium’s limestone, but the stadium’s interior seems more reminiscent of the great older ballparks from the early 20th century.

Despite its reputation as a pitchers’ park due to its generous field dimensions, Citi feels much more tightly packed than it looks on TV. My unscientific opinion is that the seats, most notably in the outfield, are built ‘up’ instead of ‘out.’ Stadium architects will do this to create a nosier environment, and it seems to have succeeded in this case.

There it is in all its beauty! The Pepsi Cola sign on the shores of the East River in Long Island City.

There it is in all its beauty! The Pepsi Cola sign on the shores of the East River in Long Island City. (That's the 59th Street Bridge a.k.a. Queensboro Bridge in the background.)

Where I think Citi really succeeds more than Yankee Stadium is that they don’t make you feel like you’re taking a trip to worship their team. (Mets fans will often counter that Citi’s Robinson Rotunda, the main entrance, makes fans worship Jackie Robinson, who didn’t play for the Mets or in Queens.) What’s distinctly different from the Mets ‘and Yanks’ parks is that the Mets just want you to have a good time while the Yanks want you to have a good time AND bow down to everything that is the Yankees legacy. It’s apparent the Yanks organization models itself as if they’re the modern-day Roman Empire of MLB.

While there’s no sense in downplaying the Yankees’ impact on baseball, it doesn’t mean fans have to be force-fed everything factoid about a team’s history.

I feel like parks have to hold a certain charm. There has to be something that draws you back, something that makes you think about the experience during the week.

It’s probably easy to roll your eyes as I, like any deep-rooted baseball fan, romanticize about the looks and grandeur of a near $1 billion park inhabited by spoiled multi-million players. Yet ballparks are the cornerstone of our national pastime, the real national pastime, despite what NFL fans might want you to believe. What separates baseball (MLB) from basketball and football (the NBA and the NFL) is that the game can be played in a variety of physical dimensions. This adds an inherent quality to the sport that you can’t find anywhere else — the mood of fans and outcomes of games can be shaped literally by the positioning of the outfield walls, among other ballpark dynamics.

All that's missing from this short is the clearly exasperated usher with the Dale Earnhardt mustache who was noticeably pissed off from all the beer drinking around him.

All that's missing from this short is the clearly exasperated usher with the Dale Earnhardt mustache who was noticeably pissed off from all the beer drinking around him.

This is what I love about Citi. The quirkiness takes away any air of superiority. You’re there to watch a baseball game, hopefully a decent one, and aren’t inundated with a history of the franchise and how incredible it is and what you can do to view the museum that is the ballpark. The self promotion is at a minimum. As a baseball fan, that’s all I need.





I love fantasy MLB

21 08 2009

If it’s Friday, then that means my name is somewhere on the Web. Thus, I must self-promote. 

Here is my weekly Weekend Watch piece on MLB.com: Weekend Watch (Aug. 21-23)

It’s interesting to me that rookies, some of whom are highlighted in WW, have played such integral roles on fantasy teams this year. Only this year’s crop, including Elvis Andrus, Dexter Fowler, Gordon Beckham and Tommy Hanson, aren’t as dynamic as past rooks such as Ryan Braun or Evan Longoria. But they’ve been essential to many teams’ success through their contributions to certain categories, such as Hanson with ERA (3.05) or Andrus with stolen bases (24). 

Also on the docket for today is my weekly Deconstructing article at SI.com via RotoExperts.com. This week, I focus on Mr. David Wright: Deconstructing David Wright

I have Wright on one of my main teams, and I’m holding out hope he’ll return in time for my playoff run. There’s nothing more demoralizing than losing a core player as you head into postseason action. 

Hope you enjoy. (We can all use a break from fantasy football.)





I have to say something about Brett Favre

18 08 2009

I absolutely hate writing about Brett Favre, since I can’t say anything that hasn’t already been said. Except for one idea.

You know who’s probably pissed more than anyone that Favre un-retired for the third fourth fifth time? John Maddon. He must have thought they were retiring together.





Nats should discover Stras’ real value

18 08 2009

 

The Nationals need something more than Stephen Strasburg -- they need lots of young talent (AP)

The Nationals need something more than Stephen Strasburg -- they need lots of young talent (AP)

  Now that the Nationals have secured Stephen Strasburg as an official member of their team, they should everything within their power to extract as much value as possible from him — by trading him.

Think about it. What do the Nats need more than anything? It’s not necessarily an ace, although they need that, too. (And there is no assurance Strasburg will become that, despite his domination of the Mountain West Conference while at San Diego State.)

What this franchise needs is a collection of young talent. They need a dynamic farm system for a variety of reasons: to establish competition in the Minors for the purpose of creating Major League-ready prospects; to give them depth for injuries to their Major League roster; to provide future trade leverage for established, difference-making veterans. The Nats have none of that. Their best young prospect prior to the Stras signing, pitcher Jordan Zimmermann, will be out for at least the next calender year once he undergoes Tommy John surgery tomorrow. There isn’t an elite position player in their farm system.

Best of all for the Nats, Strasburg’s contract comes at the relatively cheap price of $15 million. We just saw Roy Halladay and Cliff Lee go through the Trade Deadline with teams uncertain whether they wanted to trade their best prospects due to the starters’ expiring contracts next year and the prohibitive costs that would come with their new deals. Stras is signed long-term at an affordable price, and we can surmise the Nationals aren’t the only franchise highly interested in the 20-year-old. 

Given the state of their franchise, the Nats should build as the Pirates have. The Pirates traded just about every veteran they could to stockpile young talent. Nobody knows if it’ll work but the alternative to their plan — playing and paying average to above-average veterans — was a path with which the Pirates had become familiar for a decade and a half. The Nats shouldn’t want to fall into that trap.

They might not have another chance to deal a player like Strasburg: a player with supreme trade value due to his talent, makeup and exceedingly affordable contract. It would be of no use to have a potential ace if they can’t support that pitcher with an accumulation of good players around him. As much hope as Strasburg will supposedly bring Nationals fans, a plethora of talented young position players and pitchers would be the jump start the franchise truly needs. The Nationals can make it happen if they’re truly interested in maximizing Strasburg’s value.





Trying to find the Wright way

18 08 2009

Position versatility, always a critical component of fantasy baseball, seems to reach its highest levels of importance in the dog days of summer. Players’ energy levels begin dwindling, the daily guzzling of Red Bulls and endless energy supplements becoming the life support for players. 

David Wright was one of the more notable players to go down this weekend, although a season full of games was hardly to blame for his affliction. He just got popped in the head by a fastball. And with that my third base position imploded faster than Tom Cable’s fist into his assistant’s jaw. 

Fortunately, there were a couple decent third base options on my league’s free agent list. That’s the benefit of playing in a 12-team league. Good players typically linger at a longer rate than they should. 

Gordon Beckham (.306 AVG, 6 HR, 43 RBIs in 64 G) became my first pickup. His .316 batting mark in August — through the 16th — and his extra shortstop eligibility reeled me in. 

Then I looked at Garrett Atkins (.229 AVG, 8 HR, 38 RBIs in 95 G). Guys as accomplished as him don’t stay cold for an entire campaign. You have to search for the moments when they get hot. The end of the season always makes for a sneaky time as fans inevitably begin shifting their baseball focus to only the teams wrapped up in heated pennant races. Not that the Rockies are out of NL Wild Card contention, but they’re not a team that jumps out at you.

Atkins, being the forgotten man that he is in ’09, could become just the type of late-season pickup who helps boost a team in slumping times. I’m taking the chance since he’s hit safely in three of four games, including a homer, from Aug. 13-16. By the way, his career batting average in September is .329, which is by far his career-best figure for any month.

Now, if Brian Roberts needs a day off here or there (a likelihood that continues to increase for the 31-year-old), then I can shift Alexei Ramirez to second, Beckham to shortstop and put Atkins at third. 

If I need to play matchups, then I’m looking at Beckham during his road contests. He has a .372 batting average away from his home park vs. a paltry .241 mark in it.

Whether you’re playing matchups or simply trying to find a way to fill every position every day, accumulating players with multi-position eligibility goes a long way toward maximizing your roster. Especially if you ever face the day when one of your star players unexpectedly gets beaned in the head.





Throw a beer, catch the book

14 08 2009

 

Victorino catches some beer as well as the ball.

Victorino catches some beer as well as the ball.

 By now, you’ve probably seen the highlight of Shane Victorino getting doused with a cup of beer (Bud Light? Coors Light?) while making a catch at Wrigley Field on Wednesday.

 

You may also have noticed that the beer thrower has had simple battery charges filed against him by Chicago police. Two misdemeanor counts actually, one on battery and the other on illegal misconduct within a sports facility. (Bet you didn’t know the second one existed. I sure as hell didn’t.) 

Frankly, the police report filed by Victorino followed by the official charges are quite irritating. Why is this being brought to a legal level?

Couldn’t the Cubs simply ban the fan for the rest of the season, even the rest of his life if they feel they must do so? To label these charges as ‘battery’ just goes beyond the realm of logic. Victorino got hit by a plastic cup. I find it better to simplify events, to break them down to their basics, when people attempt to blow events way out of proportion. He got hit by a plastic cup and some beer.

You’re not thinking in a clear and level-headed manner if you think it’s appropriate to throw a beer at anyone, much less an athlete trying to do his job. That much almost all of us can agree. But, again, why take it to the legal level to enact punishment? Victorino wasn’t harmed and wasn’t going to be harmed by a thrown cup. After all, one of the reasons stadiums sell beer in plastic cups instead of bottles is so fans can’t pose the combined threat of drunkenness and broken glass. 

Yet instead of using common sense to simply ban the beer thrower, John Macchione, from Wrigley Field, the police, the Cubs and Victorino have to take it to an unnecessary level of legality. Isn’t there a better way for the Chicago PD to spend their time and money? This Macchione fellow doesn’t pose a threat to society. He might’ve thrown a beer bottle at Victorino if given the opportunity, but again, that’s why teams don’t sell anything in bottles. 

In the end, his punishment will go too far. Too much time will be spent prosecuting this guy. And for what? Because he threw a  plastic cup of beer at someone? It doesn’t make sense to me. It’s hardly on the list of things we should be worried about.

Update: I just read Rob Neyer’s take on the Victorino incident. We more or less have similar takes, although he thinks the fan should be prosecuted. In any case, if anyone who reads Neyer thinks I was trying to pawn off his thoughts, that wasn’t the case. The link to his story is below:

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/sweetspot/0-4-169/Throw-love–not-beer.html





Deconstructing Matt Wieters

13 08 2009

Deconstructing Matt Wieters

My latest SI.com contribution, via RotoExperts.com, is above. I had a chance to trade for Wieters in a dynasty league a few months ago. It was actually just before his callup and his owner, if my memory serves correct, wanted Zach Greinke, Josh Beckett and one or two more pieces. I think I was to get a prospect or two in return but I shut it down. 

I was splitting time between second and third place then and didn’t want to compromise my season by trading two stud pitchers for a rookie hitter. Now that I’ve nosedived into fourth place (fifth has my name on it any day now), I have a slight regret at not catching Wieters when I had the chance. On the other hand, Jason Jaramillo has more RBIs than Wieters in a quarter fewer at-bats. 

You fantasy baseball nerds reading this can figure out whether or not you want to target Wieters in future trade discussions.





See ya, Rambis

12 08 2009

 

This is where the idea for short shorts was exposed at its worst.

This is where the idea for short shorts was exposed at its worst.

I thought Kurt Rambis had the future Lakers coaching gig on lockdown — until he decided to take the post vacated by the man who once clotheslined him to near death.

Rambo is taking over head coaching duties for the Minnesota Timberwolves formerly held by ex-Celtic Kevin McHale (yes, that’s him with his arm draped around Rambis’ neck) and you want to know the first thing that came to mind? After over two decades of playing and coaching for the Los Angeles Lakers, his wife must be REALLY pissed that she has to not only leave all her L.A. friends but tackle the epically frigid Minnesota winters. At least this gives her an excuse to buy winter clothes. 

Rambis’ exit leaves an air of uncertainty in the future of the Lakers’ head coaching spot given the conventional wisdom that 63-year-old Phil Jackson (he’ll be 64 by the time next season begins) will retire in the next year or two. 

Yet Rambis made a comment at his introductory Timberwolves press conference Tuesday that Jackson might coach five or six more years. I immediately disputed this until realizing a point is to be taken from that thought. Why would Jackson, a serial competitor, leave the Bryant-Gasol-Odom-Bynum-Artest quintet? More to the point, why would Jackson leave Bryant anytime during his prime? 

Even for a man who’s had the privilege of coaching Michael Jordan, the greatest basketball player of all-time, the rarity of coaching a player of near-equal caliber, like Kobe Bryant, has to be too sweet an opportunity to pass. Think of Jackson’s love and respect for the game, like any good coach has. Wouldn’t they want to see a player like Bryant through his prime? 

I can’t be sure, but I can imagine Jackson sitting on the deck of his summer home in Montana thinking about the battles and championships and memories he would pass up by opting not to return to the Lakers helm, with Bryant leading the charge. He alone would make me believe Jackson is intent on keeping his coaching gig for longer than he lets on to the press. But with Gasol, Odom and Artest in their prime and Bynum (hopefully) developing into one of the NBA’s elite big men, there doesn’t seem to be any realistic reason — aside from physical health — why Jackson would consider retiring from the game anytime soon.

One last thought: Rambis exemplifies the transition in physical appearance from the ’80s to the ’00s as well as anybody. Witness:

 

How one man has turned from this...

How one man has turned from this...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...to this is a sign of how ridiculous people looked in the '80s.

...to this is a sign of how ridiculous people looked in the '80s.





The Stadium and The Greatest

11 08 2009

We all like to live experiences that allow us shorten the list of things we want to do in our lives. As a sports fan, I’m always looking for new games/events to witness in person. I’ve missed out on a couple fantastic sports experiences — Kobe scoring 61 at the Garden and the U.S. Open — this year. 

Yet I was presented with the chance last week to visit the Stadium for the opening contest of the four-game series between the Yankees and Red Sox. Would I dare miss a chance to watch the opening game of a series pitting two storied rivals against each other in the heat of a pennant race? No. Would I unknowingly pounce on an additional sports experience by buying the Yanks ticket? Oh, you bet. To the picures. Comments from fans during the game run after the pictures.

Before the pictures, some clarification is needed. I didn’t go up to people, and I regret it. It probably tarnishes this story, and I will try to make it up by going to a Mets game in September when all the Mets fans are too depressed to know I’m taking photos of them. I also didn’t take pictures once the game began since I didn’t want to be “that guy.” And it’s not real fun trying to snap photos while scrunched into ballpark seats.

 

If there's any team that boasts enough great players in its history to justify all these banners, it's the Yankees. I'd put the Lakers, Celtics, Steelers and Giants on that list, too. Any others you can think of?
If there’s any team that boasts enough great players in its history to justify all these banners, it’s the Yankees. I’d put the Lakers, Celtics, Steelers and Giants on that list, too. Any others you can think of?

 

 

Ahhh yes, green grass. Notice the gargantuan scoreboard. Also note the commercial message on the 'board, which can also be used to describe Yanks tickets given their ridiculous prices.
Ahhh yes, green grass. Notice the gargantuan scoreboard. Also note the commercial message on the ‘board, which can also be used to describe Yanks tickets given their ridiculous prices.

 

 

Yes, this unnamed player made this catch. Yes, this sign makes zero sense. Are there really enough Chinese-speaking folks in NYC to make this ad worthwhile? Or do the Yanks buy these things for the 3 billion people around the world who watch their games on YES?
Yes, this unnamed player made this catch. Yes, this sign makes zero sense. Are there really enough Chinese-speaking folks in NYC to make this ad worthwhile? Or do the Yanks buy these things for the 3 billion people around the world who watch their games on YES?

 

 

I went straight to the beer. For you non-New Yorkers, $6 is standard fare for brewskies in Manhattan. There's a Johnny Rockets next to this stand, but I wasn't down with the ballpark food that night. I had a $10 chicken finger and fries the first time I went to the stadium, but I really wasn't into dipping any more cash than the ticket's price.
I went straight to the beer. For you non-New Yorkers, $6 is standard fare for brewskies in Manhattan. There’s a Johnny Rockets next to this stand, but I wasn’t down with the ballpark food that night. I had a $10 chicken finger and fries the first time I went to the stadium, but I really wasn’t into dipping any more cash than the ticket’s price.

 

 

Dude in the L.A. hat is cool. Basically, this is showing the calm before the storm. All these people are getting primed to kill, torture and maim any Red Sox fan dumb enough to walk into their lair.
Dude in the L.A. hat is cool. Basically, this is showing the calm before the storm. All these people are getting primed to kill, torture and maim any Red Sox fan dumb enough to walk into their lair.

 

 

I don't know what it is about ground crews but I love watching them clear the field after batting practice.

I don't know what it is about ground crews but I love watching them clear the field after batting practice.

 

 

Could it be?

Could it be?

 

 

It is! The Greatest! He was at the park for some ceremony which I don't care about. But to see Muhammad Ali in person is another experience to cross off the list with the name that annoys me.

It is! The Greatest! He was at the park for some ceremony which I don't care about. But to see Muhammad Ali in person is another experience to cross off the list with the name that annoys me.

 

 

 

And now the list of quotes to show the intelligence that persists at your regular Yankees-Red Sox game:

(Yes, these are real quotes that I wrote furiously into my Fat Book)

Pregame

-One man to another who was looking for a seat: “My casa mi casa.” I know Spanish about as well as I know Organic Chemistry, but I’m pretty sure that sentence doesn’t translate.

-Yanks fan who spotted an unfortunate fool wearing one of those Pedroia t-shirt jersey things: “Hey Pedroia, you suck!”  – ”Pedroia, is that your boyfriend on the left!”  – ”Pedroia, you better go find your seats! It’s gonna be a long night!” (voice cracks like a 13-year-old at the long night part)

1st Inning

-Yanks fan to Boston fan daring to cheer for Kevin Youkilis striding to the plate: “What are ya, taking steroids or something? Shut up!”

-Same Yanks fan to Hot Red Sox Girl sitting behind me: “You better get outta here!”

2nd Inning

-Same Yanks fan (this is a theme, believe me) to Hot Red Sox Girl and her annoying boyfriend after Melky Cabrera held J.D. Drew at second base after throwing to third after catching a Casey Kotchman fly: “What’d I tell you about that shit!? I feel bad for your parents! They didn’t want you to grow up being losers!”

3rd Inning

SAME Yanks fan to Hot Red Sox Girl after Pedroia homered. They got into a scoreboard debate and this popped out for some reason from the Yanks fan: “I’ll teach you how to count! Sesame Street!”

5th Inning

Red Sox fan to SAME Yanks fan after the guy, who was fat and wearing a sleeveless shirt (of course), wouldn’t stop taunting any Red Sox fan within 200 feet since the game’s opening pitch: “Leave us alone!”

I have to say that it was a fairly mellow experience, aside from seeing the two Yanks fans get tossed for undisclosed reasons in the 5th inning. I didn’t hear the first “Boston sucks” chant until the 4th frame. Only when Papi came to the plate for each at-bat and the crowded began its “Steroids! Steroids!” routine did I feel things could get heated. 

 

 

 








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.